← The Future of Work series Superagency: Reid Hoffman's Big Idea
Part of the Future of Work series — I've been tracking everything written about the future of work in the AI era. Research, decisions, predictions. A lot of noise. Some signal. In each post, I take one specific move and ask: what does this actually mean?

Here's the thing nobody's talking about.

All the media screams: "AI will replace jobs." "Workers need to reskill." "The future is uncertain."

But nobody asks the opposite question.

What if workers actually want something different?

What Reid Hoffman is claiming

Reid Hoffman, founder of LinkedIn, has been talking about "Superagency."

His argument: AI doesn't replace people. It multiplies them.

Not everyone gets the capabilities of 10 people. But AI gives everyone abilities that only 10% had yesterday.

You don't get replaced. You get amplified.

A writer with Claude can produce five times more content. A developer with GitHub Copilot writes code faster. A manager with AI tools handles complexity that required three people last year.

So the story isn't "AI replaces jobs." It's "AI makes each person more powerful."

But here's the catch

Hoffman's vision assumes people want to be more powerful.

But that's not always what people actually want.

Some people want: "I show up, I do my work, I go home. I don't think about it."

Superagency demands the opposite. More autonomy? More responsibility. More decisions. More ownership.

That's not what everyone signed up for.

The real insight

Hoffman's superagency is real. It's happening. People with AI tools ARE becoming more capable.

But it creates a split:

People who embrace amplification become incredibly valuable. They produce more. They think bigger. They own outcomes.

People who just want to do their job get left behind. Because their job just got more complex. And if they're not amplifying, they're not keeping up.

What this means

The future of work isn't about replacement. It's about acceleration.

Some people will accelerate with AI. They'll thrive. The people you want to work with will probably be the ones who do.

Others will get left behind. Not because AI replaced them. Because the world moved faster than they wanted to move.

That's sadder. And more complicated.

Because it's not a technical problem. It's a human one.

Want more on managing in the AI era?

The Little Book for New Managers has helped 30,000+ managers figure out what actually works.

Get the book ($19) →